Author: Mark Young
Date: 13:51:07 02/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2005 at 16:39:02, Stephen Ham wrote: >On February 14, 2005 at 15:03:31, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote: > >> Please see ==> http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2195 > >Bom Dia, José > >Gosh, that was a review? It read more like an advertizement. > >As for the reviewer, I saw no evidence that he was able to back up what he >claimed. While I don't doubt that much of what he wrote is indeed true, one >still wonders whether he wrote from first hand experience, or whether he wrote >based upon ChessBase's blurb on the back of the program's CD-box. > >I'm completing my review of Junior 9 for ChessCafe.com now. I've subjected >Junior 9 to tests against other engines, and compared its move selection from >positions in my correspondence chess games to others. My conclusions are quite >favorable...I like Junior 9 a lot. I think that Amir and Shay did a fine job >with this engine. > >All the best, >Stephen I look forward to your review of Junior 9. I personally like the Junior programs to a point. The problem seems to be along with the many great moves... Junior can play erratic in some position. How does Junior 9 fair in this regard?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.