Author: Peter Berger
Date: 16:54:03 02/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2005 at 19:38:12, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >Not really. It is presmise already debated previously. It doesnt provide a new >light about the thopic. Sorry. OK, one more (and no, I never claimed to have any special skills and ideas in this area at all, that was you and Vincent :) ). One of the poor programs provided with a book by me and playing with the black pieces will be out of book after 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. cxd5 as happened for Crafty against Diep last year , if I hadn't thought of this possibilty before - isn't that just awful ? I don't think so, it's just logical. Control has become a major point IMHO , the engines don't do too bad on their own. Of course it is better if you thought of some potentially relevant line like this, but better nothing than random grandmaster lines. Yes, you opposed this point of view multiple times before in discussions with Uri , but I think you never managed to score. I'd accept a challenge btw - over a good bottle of wine, champaigne, or so.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.