Author: Uri Blass
Date: 17:56:44 02/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2005 at 20:08:42, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On February 14, 2005 at 19:54:03, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On February 14, 2005 at 19:38:12, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>Not really. It is presmise already debated previously. It doesnt provide a new >>>light about the thopic. Sorry. >> >>OK, one more (and no, I never claimed to have any special skills and ideas in >>this area at all, that was you and Vincent :) ). One of the poor programs >>provided with a book by me and playing with the black pieces will be out of book >>after 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. cxd5 as happened for Crafty against Diep last year , >>if I hadn't thought of this possibilty before - isn't that just awful ? I don't >>think so, it's just logical. Control has become a major point IMHO , the engines >>don't do too bad on their own. Of course it is better if you thought of some >>potentially relevant line like this, but better nothing than random grandmaster >>lines. Yes, you opposed this point of view multiple times before in discussions >>with Uri , but I think you never managed to score. I'd accept a challenge btw - >>over a good bottle of wine, champaigne, or so. > >Well, a lack of memory..... In WCC2004 just another game.... Fritz-Diep where >the Opening Preparation was relevant. I remember that Fritz lost the game because of a stupid blunder when it sacrificed material for no reason when other programs can avoid that mistake. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.