Author: stuart taylor
Date: 07:39:16 02/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2005 at 04:48:23, George C Williams wrote: >On February 15, 2005 at 04:18:55, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On February 15, 2005 at 02:52:17, George C Williams wrote: >>> I was just identifying the engine version i had, relax uri don't be so >>>critical, live and let live. Stop nickpickin, your wife (if your even >>>married)must find you very exhausting lol. This is not a college English class >>>and your not my professor. >> >>what is the sense of testing Pro Deo versus S9 ?? >> >>Pro Deo (in default style) was unable to beat S8 ! >>Now you test against S9 and you also test 40/2 minutes ??? >> >>or hours ? >> >>if it is minutes you can forget it IMO. >> >>Pro Deo needs time to come deep. S9 is faster deep. >>so it will outsearch Pro Deo heavily. >> >>The result will be that S9 wins. > > > >40 moves in 2 hours OFCOURSE, I wanted to see if Shredder could beat Pro deo >with vastly inferior hardware. When I try to test things, I also like to give the one I'm trying to prove weaker....more time, so I can feel better about it. What I have found, however, is that the Shredder Classic which was recently available for trial download, is NOT much stronger than Arasan 8.2, against which I've been testing each other. This is a bit off topic, but It just reminded me of it. They are anyway not test games which I know how to feed into this forum mechanically, so I'm not trying to make headlines of it, as I can't compete with the "computer freaks" here. (at these times) Anyhow, Arasan is competitively strong, and quite active (anti-human?) in its moves. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.