Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Great CM9000 Showdown (Round 2 of 34 completed)

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 09:30:57 02/15/05

Go up one level in this thread


On February 15, 2005 at 04:49:19, Chris Taylor wrote:

>On February 15, 2005 at 01:26:42, Graham Banks wrote:
>
>>THE GREAT CM9000 SHOWDOWN!
>>
>>Athlon XP1900+
>>128mb hash each
>>3,4,5 men tablebases
>>Ponder on
>>No opening books
>>34 rounds (2 cycles) at 40 moves in 80 minutes repeating
>>
>>
>>Standings after Round 2
>>
>>2.0	- Mapi
>>2.0	- Minotaur
>>1.5	- Assassin
>>1.5	- Justice
>>1.5	- Slayer 2b
>>1.5	- TO5
>>1.0	- Judge
>>1.0	- Judge II
>>1.0	- Pillen
>>1.0	- Slayer
>>1.0	- Surak 8c
>>0.5	- Alliance
>>0.5	- Gladiator
>>0.5	- Minotaur 2
>>0.5	- R1
>>0.5	- RIX
>>0.5	- SKR
>>0.0	- R2
>
>I do not understand why you are using ponder on?  Is this auto232, on two
>computers?
>
>Chris


Hi Chris,

I decided to use ponder on so that it would be more interesting to watch. Tests
carried out by Volker Pittlik have shown that whether or not you use ponder on
or off on a single cpu does not impact on the relative results.

Regards, Graham.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.