Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Too bad Pro Deo 1.1 isn't in it (maybe not real "amateur"?) (NT)

Author: Karl-Heinz Söntges

Date: 10:34:10 02/15/05

Go up one level in this thread

On February 15, 2005 at 12:00:49, Rick Hagen wrote:

>.
>(or Ktulu, or Pharaon, or Ruffian 1.01 or...)
>
>No Text!


Ktulu + Ruffian are commercial !
Pro Deo (ex commercial) and Pharaon are weaker.
Only the" first 6"

• Re: Too bad Pro Deo 1.1 isn't in it (maybe not real "amateur"?) (NT) Rick Hagen 11:06:39 02/15/05
  • Re: Too bad Pro Deo 1.1 isn't in it (maybe not real "amateur"?) (NT) Rick Hagen 11:14:57 02/15/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.