Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Too bad Pro Deo 1.1 isn't in it (maybe not real "amateur"?) (NT)

Author: Rick Hagen

Date: 11:06:39 02/15/05

Go up one level in this thread


On February 15, 2005 at 13:34:10, Karl-Heinz Söntges wrote:

>On February 15, 2005 at 12:00:49, Rick Hagen wrote:
>
>>.
>>(or Ktulu, or Pharaon, or Ruffian 1.01 or...)
>>
>>No Text!
>
>
>Ktulu + Ruffian are commercial !
>Pro Deo (ex commercial) and Pharaon are weaker.
>Only the" first 6"

Dear Karl-Heinz,

Ktulu 4.2 isn't commercial, and it's pretty strong...
In fact it has a higher rating on my list than the commercial 5.1

Ruffian 1.01 isn't commercial, as is 1.05; and they're pretty strong.
Both were amateurs before going pro, opposite to Pro Deo.

But I'm not critisizing you, it was tongue-in-cheek.
Sorry I forgot the smiley.
So, here for you:
:-)
;-)
:-p

Good luck with your tournament!

Rick



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.