Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 11:13:47 02/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2005 at 12:30:57, Graham Banks wrote:
>On February 15, 2005 at 04:49:19, Chris Taylor wrote:
>
>>On February 15, 2005 at 01:26:42, Graham Banks wrote:
>>
>>>THE GREAT CM9000 SHOWDOWN!
>>>
>>>Athlon XP1900+
>>>128mb hash each
>>>3,4,5 men tablebases
>>>Ponder on
>>>No opening books
>>>34 rounds (2 cycles) at 40 moves in 80 minutes repeating
>>>
>>>
>>>Standings after Round 2
>>>
>>>2.0 - Mapi
>>>2.0 - Minotaur
>>>1.5 - Assassin
>>>1.5 - Justice
>>>1.5 - Slayer 2b
>>>1.5 - TO5
>>>1.0 - Judge
>>>1.0 - Judge II
>>>1.0 - Pillen
>>>1.0 - Slayer
>>>1.0 - Surak 8c
>>>0.5 - Alliance
>>>0.5 - Gladiator
>>>0.5 - Minotaur 2
>>>0.5 - R1
>>>0.5 - RIX
>>>0.5 - SKR
>>>0.0 - R2
>>
>>I do not understand why you are using ponder on? Is this auto232, on two
>>computers?
>>
>>Chris
>
>
>Hi Chris,
>
>I decided to use ponder on so that it would be more interesting to watch. Tests
>carried out by Volker Pittlik have shown that whether or not you use ponder on
>or off on a single cpu does not impact on the relative results.
>
>Regards, Graham.
Hi Graham
A warning to you: you might get in trouble when both
engines are accessing the same EGTB, or do you have
given separate paths for each engine?
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.