Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 12:41:16 02/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2005 at 14:48:45, Mark Young wrote: >On February 15, 2005 at 06:15:02, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On February 14, 2005 at 23:47:13, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>sorry...16 g3! >> >> Yes against humans Kasparov perhaps would play it, but against Junior after >>16...Nh2+ 17.Kf2 Ng4+ 18.Kg2 Qh2+ 19.Kf3 h5 the positions starts to be TOO >>complicated for any human to play against a tactical monster and especially Deep >>Junior! >> >>But how about 18.Ke1!.....? I think if Kasparov have seen this it would play >>16.g3! So perhaps you are right.................After 18.Ke1! Qh2 19.Kd1 and >>white has the advantage............... > >I think he saw the right plan after g3!. He just did not want to risk missing >something. Looking at it now, it seems he made a mistake. I don't think it was >very risky at all for a player like Kasparov's. It is a suicide to play a game full of tactics with your King in the center, against a Chess engine EVEN if you are Kasparov.......... >White is just clearly winning. >The point is Bxh2? is not a good move, but a losing move by force. No. The position is much more difficult and tricky than you think and it's far from a winning one. One main reason is the weak e3 Pawn which causes many problems for white even after having his King at d1 or c1.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.