Author: ludicrous
Date: 20:54:10 02/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
Thank you all for your comments! My point is that Pro Deo is now proven to be very capable of playing very dangerous, speculative lines now more than ever. On February 15, 2005 at 15:41:16, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On February 15, 2005 at 14:48:45, Mark Young wrote: > >>On February 15, 2005 at 06:15:02, George Tsavdaris wrote: >> >>>On February 14, 2005 at 23:47:13, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>sorry...16 g3! >>> >>> Yes against humans Kasparov perhaps would play it, but against Junior after >>>16...Nh2+ 17.Kf2 Ng4+ 18.Kg2 Qh2+ 19.Kf3 h5 the positions starts to be TOO >>>complicated for any human to play against a tactical monster and especially Deep >>>Junior! >>> >>>But how about 18.Ke1!.....? I think if Kasparov have seen this it would play >>>16.g3! So perhaps you are right.................After 18.Ke1! Qh2 19.Kd1 and >>>white has the advantage............... >> >>I think he saw the right plan after g3!. He just did not want to risk missing >>something. Looking at it now, it seems he made a mistake. I don't think it was >>very risky at all for a player like Kasparov's. > > It is a suicide to play a game full of tactics with your King in the center, >against a Chess engine EVEN if you are Kasparov.......... > >>White is just clearly winning. >>The point is Bxh2? is not a good move, but a losing move by force. > >No. The position is much more difficult and tricky than you think and it's far >from a winning one. One main reason is the weak e3 Pawn which causes many >problems for white even after having his King at d1 or c1.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.