Author: martin fierz
Date: 01:54:28 02/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2005 at 11:27:41, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 15, 2005 at 04:50:57, martin fierz wrote: > >>On February 14, 2005 at 18:57:07, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>Well, if you think that Uri´s posting are not ludicrous, we are alll entering in >>>the absurd world of Uri. >> >>i wonder what your problem is arturo. if you cannot admit that a good book is >>not worth 700 points you are either an impostor or a just a fool. do you even >>know what 700 rating points difference means? that's statistically a 99-1 result >>in a 100 games, just because of a book?? > >You are in a fantasy world. Please remove book from an engine and go join a >world champs with it. > >What are your odds to become #1? > >If they are 0% then you missed somewhere 750+ rating points. > >What weak spot was it then that caused you to miss those 750 rating points? > >Well i can tell you... ...it was book :) so - let me see if i understand you right... you think that if you have "only" 650 rating points less your chances rise markedly? clueless, vincent, clueless! cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.