Author: martin fierz
Date: 01:54:28 02/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2005 at 11:27:41, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 15, 2005 at 04:50:57, martin fierz wrote: > >>On February 14, 2005 at 18:57:07, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>Well, if you think that Uri´s posting are not ludicrous, we are alll entering in >>>the absurd world of Uri. >> >>i wonder what your problem is arturo. if you cannot admit that a good book is >>not worth 700 points you are either an impostor or a just a fool. do you even >>know what 700 rating points difference means? that's statistically a 99-1 result >>in a 100 games, just because of a book?? > >You are in a fantasy world. Please remove book from an engine and go join a >world champs with it. > >What are your odds to become #1? > >If they are 0% then you missed somewhere 750+ rating points. > >What weak spot was it then that caused you to miss those 750 rating points? > >Well i can tell you... ...it was book :) so - let me see if i understand you right... you think that if you have "only" 650 rating points less your chances rise markedly? clueless, vincent, clueless! cheers martin
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.