Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 09:46:24 02/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2005 at 18:54:26, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi John, > >I want to start near the end of your posting: > >> (Forget about Nalimov's EGTB probing code and any other code that can be >> used with permission). > >THIS is the point where clones are splitted. When everything happens with >permission of the author of the original source and with mentioning him >everywhere, then I am fine with that. Example: Beowulf (original) and Horizon... >or TSCP (original) and Trace (where I believe that the newer Trace have not much >TSCP left in them) >Here, everything is fine... > >If there is no permission and/or no mentioning copying source-code is definitely >a "no-no" ! IMO a clone is a clone... If you don't have the permission it's an illegal clone otherwise it's a legal clone but still a clone. /Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.