Author: Ingo Bauer
Date: 12:00:53 02/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
>The co-author of the UCI standard doesn't use the "own book" option for his >engine/book. Even Gandalf has this option. I will guarantee if Hiarcs becomes >available as UCI, it will support this. IIRC: In the beginning UCI was designed as "stateless", which means that the engine does not know anything about the game itself. Because many programmers demanded the possibility to use their own book the "own book" feature was implemented (as the "usinewgame" feature was implemented shortly). >It is almost a proprietary move to force people to use your interface, yet in >the same regard it isn't because you allow the engine to be used elsewhere, but >the book is locked. In the meantime we now that you do not like the decision but your reasoning is a bit odd to me. With the same argument you could deny to buy any Chessbase engine because the book is completly handled by the the CB-GUI AND the Engines are not able to run somewhere else. It seems Chessbase is "forcing" you to their interface even more. Will you argue against their decisions with the same effort OR will you buy S9 from Shredderchess if Stefan is offering you a S9 version that is able only to run in the Classic interface? I doubt that this question needs an answer! I think i have said all I can in this matter! Bye Ingo Bauer
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.