Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 12:56:15 02/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2005 at 15:48:27, George C Williams wrote:
>On February 16, 2005 at 15:39:07, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On February 16, 2005 at 15:26:40, Mike van Rooyen wrote:
>>
>>>Very very strong.A definite improvement.However,Shredder is sometimes very
>>>optimistic in its evaluation.It has lost quite a few +3 positions in my tests.
>>>I'm therefore reluctant to trust its evaluations for analysis.
>>>Mike
>>
>>
>> Shredder 9 Test (40'/40) 5moves.ctg is running,
>> now 3 matches and 150 games played, to be continued
>> http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm
>> Kurt
>
>
> So how does your reply answer his observations about shredder's analysis
>problem, i don't get it?
Shredder 9 evaluation has - compared to Shredder 8 -
become much more stable and to loose a game after
+3 should be an extraordinary exception. I should
like to see such games.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.