Author: stuart taylor
Date: 15:26:06 02/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2005 at 15:39:07, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On February 16, 2005 at 15:26:40, Mike van Rooyen wrote: > >>Very very strong.A definite improvement.However,Shredder is sometimes very >>optimistic in its evaluation.It has lost quite a few +3 positions in my tests. >>I'm therefore reluctant to trust its evaluations for analysis. >>Mike > > > Shredder 9 Test (40'/40) 5moves.ctg is running, > now 3 matches and 150 games played, to be continued > http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm > Kurt I much prefer to see the lost games (of a program I'm trying to "prove") as being draws, i.e. 2 draws = one loss, than singal games actually being lost, because that indicates a weakness. If most of the losses are as black, that's a (very) slight relief, too. Junior has managed to hurt Shredder 9 quite a bit, in this respect, and that indicates to me that Shredder 9 still has plenty left to hope for (e.g. in Shredder 10 etc.) But if Junior just happens to be Shredder's nemesis, then Shredder is still doing very well, however. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.