Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 03:43:29 02/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2005 at 05:03:17, stuart taylor wrote:
>There are a few of them on this and recent pages, and some ideas are similar to
>things I've written earlier. But what _I_ consider to be my best posts are
>usually simply ignored (seemingly). I hope that means that people agree with
>some of my points. (like that 6 draws say better about a machine than 3 losses
>etc. [because losses necesitate weakness, whereas draws, maybe yes, maybe not]).
>S.Taylor
Hi Stuart
I do not agree and would assume that losses of a machine
say more about the program. Can you please explain in
detail why you think the other way round?
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.