Author: Harald Faber
Date: 03:45:09 01/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 1999 at 12:21:55, Thoralf Karlsson wrote: >>I don't understand the relevance of playing such a match without identical >>hardware for each program. Can anyone explain? > >If you are interested in the result of a match between Hiarcs 7 and Hiarcs 6, >you should of course use the same hardware. That match will be played sooner or >later by someone in SSDF who has two PCs with P200 MMX. Hmm, ask Bob about the sense in playing program A against the predecessor. I don't see any sense in it too. Why not play H7 against Rebel9 on P90 e.g.? >But for SSDF the primary goal now is to get a rating for Hiarcs 7 P200 MMX. This >can be achieved by playing against combinations of program/hardware with "known" >SSDF-ratings. In this case against Hiarcs 6 P90 which at the moment has 2437 >after 1214 games against other entries. Rebel9 has a lot of games too. >PS A new rating list will appear in a few days. New entries are Hiarcs 7 and >Fritz 5.32. Any hints? :-) I guess H7 hitting the top and F5.32 behind, 4 pts >F5.16. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.