Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 13:38:28 02/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2005 at 14:54:40, George C Williams wrote:
>On February 17, 2005 at 14:09:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>Test: Shredder 9 UCI by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
>>Time control: 40 min/40 moves
>>Hardware: Ath 1.3/64 MB hash
>>ponder=off, 3-4 men EGTB, Fritz8-GUI
>>book=5moves.ctg, normal, no learning
>>Details and games download at:
>>[http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm]
>>
>>
>> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + -
>>
>> 1 Shredder 9 UCI : 123.0/200 61.5 2460 2541 41 41
>> 2 Junior 9 : 23.0/ 50 46.0 2541 2513 75 96
>> 3 Fritz 8 : 19.5/ 50 39.0 2541 2464 75 88
>> 4 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 18.5/ 50 37.0 2541 2449 76 85
>> 5 Gandalf 6.0 : 16.0/ 50 32.0 2541 2410 101 80
>
>
>
> You know Kurt it would be nice if you would put these statistics in some sort
>of context for us, I see these and have no ideal what it means, for instance how
>does these results compare to shredder 8? Is Shredder9 Performing better or
>worst, ect,
>
>
>thanks
Hi George
It would indeed be nice to have such a comparison but I don't
think that we are going to "replay" all the necessary games
with Shredder 8. A small comparison may be our "5moves 2004"
tournament, report/games at http://www.utzingerk.com/5moves.htm
From your wish I take it that you have some doubts if Shredder 9
is stronger than Shredder 8?
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.