Author: George C Williams
Date: 13:46:36 02/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2005 at 16:38:28, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On February 17, 2005 at 14:54:40, George C Williams wrote: > >>On February 17, 2005 at 14:09:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Test: Shredder 9 UCI by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen >>>Time control: 40 min/40 moves >>>Hardware: Ath 1.3/64 MB hash >>>ponder=off, 3-4 men EGTB, Fritz8-GUI >>>book=5moves.ctg, normal, no learning >>>Details and games download at: >>>[http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm] >>> >>> >>> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - >>> >>> 1 Shredder 9 UCI : 123.0/200 61.5 2460 2541 41 41 >>> 2 Junior 9 : 23.0/ 50 46.0 2541 2513 75 96 >>> 3 Fritz 8 : 19.5/ 50 39.0 2541 2464 75 88 >>> 4 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 18.5/ 50 37.0 2541 2449 76 85 >>> 5 Gandalf 6.0 : 16.0/ 50 32.0 2541 2410 101 80 >> >> >> >> You know Kurt it would be nice if you would put these statistics in some sort >>of context for us, I see these and have no ideal what it means, for instance how >>does these results compare to shredder 8? Is Shredder9 Performing better or >>worst, ect, >> >> >>thanks > > > Hi George > It would indeed be nice to have such a comparison but I don't > think that we are going to "replay" all the necessary games > with Shredder 8. A small comparison may be our "5moves 2004" > tournament, report/games at http://www.utzingerk.com/5moves.htm > From your wish I take it that you have some doubts if Shredder 9 > is stronger than Shredder 8? > Kurt Actually I don't know if Shredder9 is stronger or not, I would just like to see some evidence to prove that it is.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.