Author: Helmut Conrady
Date: 14:29:22 02/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2005 at 16:46:36, George C Williams wrote: >On February 17, 2005 at 16:38:28, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On February 17, 2005 at 14:54:40, George C Williams wrote: >> >>>On February 17, 2005 at 14:09:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>Test: Shredder 9 UCI by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen >>>>Time control: 40 min/40 moves >>>>Hardware: Ath 1.3/64 MB hash >>>>ponder=off, 3-4 men EGTB, Fritz8-GUI >>>>book=5moves.ctg, normal, no learning >>>>Details and games download at: >>>>[http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm] >>>> >>>> >>>> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - >>>> >>>> 1 Shredder 9 UCI : 123.0/200 61.5 2460 2541 41 41 >>>> 2 Junior 9 : 23.0/ 50 46.0 2541 2513 75 96 >>>> 3 Fritz 8 : 19.5/ 50 39.0 2541 2464 75 88 >>>> 4 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 18.5/ 50 37.0 2541 2449 76 85 >>>> 5 Gandalf 6.0 : 16.0/ 50 32.0 2541 2410 101 80 >>> >>> >>> >>> You know Kurt it would be nice if you would put these statistics in some sort >>>of context for us, I see these and have no ideal what it means, for instance how >>>does these results compare to shredder 8? Is Shredder9 Performing better or >>>worst, ect, >>> >>> >>>thanks >> >> >> Hi George >> It would indeed be nice to have such a comparison but I don't >> think that we are going to "replay" all the necessary games >> with Shredder 8. A small comparison may be our "5moves 2004" >> tournament, report/games at http://www.utzingerk.com/5moves.htm >> From your wish I take it that you have some doubts if Shredder 9 >> is stronger than Shredder 8? >> Kurt > > > >Actually I don't know if Shredder9 is stronger or not, I would just like to see >some evidence to prove that it is. Try this link: http://www.computerschach.com/rangliste/english/ (button: "eternal list"). Helmut
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.