Author: Gregory Owett
Date: 08:42:19 02/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2005 at 08:53:07, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On February 18, 2005 at 05:05:08, Gregory Owett wrote: > >>On February 17, 2005 at 16:18:08, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >>>Wait for 1.0 (a few more days now) and then run some games at 90+30. >>> >>>anthony >> >>I impatiently wait for it ! >> >>I hope, it will be good too for the fast (~25'-30') games. A strong engine must >>be performante at all time control, IMO. >> >>Of course, at 90+30 the games are better level, but to make play much games >>require long time. Fast games must already give a good idea of the level of the >>engine. >> >>Gregory > >I feel 1.0 is better than 0.8 . . I'm not sure how much (say 50 elo?). Zappa >plays fast games adequately on my machine (64-bits), but on your machine it will >get some 200 knps so it needs time to get up 12 ply :) There are no tournaments >at 25/30 minutes per game, so I don't worry about those timecontrols. I work >more on adding knowledge than optimizing. > >anthony >I hope, it will be good too for the fast (~25'-30') games. Sorry ! I badly wrote. That didn't want to say 25/30, but approximately 25' or 30' of play by game. Gregory
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.