Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:44:22 02/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2005 at 10:45:00, GeoffW wrote: >Hi > >WAC might not be any challenge to the Crafties of this world but I find it still >really useful for testing. Just after reading Dan's post below I had been >testing a re-writen a section of my code. I was convinced it was OK and bug free >till I ran WAC at 1 sec per position. The good variety of positions and the >speedy time per position soon showed up my bug. > >Easy test, but can you guess what I had been rewriting and what I had overlooked >from the position below ? (9 or so ply down into WAC 115) > >[D]5k2/6pp/8/q7/pP5P/P5P1/5P2/4K3 b - b3 0 1 > > Geoff I would suspect your passed pawn race code was broken. :) Qxb4 is obvious but irrelevant as black wins most any way he wants being a queen up...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.