Author: ramon b. de robles
Date: 06:35:18 01/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 1999 at 07:21:31, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On January 28, 1999 at 06:09:14, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On January 28, 1999 at 05:26:41, ramon b. de robles wrote: >> >>>On January 27, 1999 at 21:22:47, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >>> > >Uli, hi. I don't think that it was Crafty that went down 20-0. I believe that >it was Bionic that lost :) That's why the question dealt with the possibility of >Bionic playing better under Winboard... > >Perhaps I am wrong -- have no idea until the question is rephrased. > >Anyway, I have no idea what went wrong. These two programs (or versions of one >and the same program) are very close in strength, with Bionic being definitely >better positionally and Crafty tactically. And yes, I don't think that any >program can beat Crafty 20-0 at blitz, yet... At lightning (bullet) I know of >one that is close to it now :)) > >Regards, >Djordje You are right Djordje, it is Bionic who lost by 20 - 0. Anyway, the hash table is 16 MB. I repeat the test and use 32 MB and the score is 8-2 in favor of Crafty 16.3 (Bionic with two(2) draws and one(1) win. I matched it with Little Goliath and the score is 5 - in favor of Little Goliath. Of course, I used the Fritz 5.32 interface. Regards, ramon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.