Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 05:14:04 02/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2005 at 08:00:17, Jason Kent wrote:
>On February 19, 2005 at 04:52:20, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>Test: Shredder 9 UCI by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
>>Time control: 40 min/40 moves
>>Hardware: Ath 1.3/64 MB hash
>>ponder=off, 3-4 men EGTB, Fritz8-GUI
>>book=5moves.ctg, normal, no learning
>>Details and games download at:
>>[http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm]
>>
>>
>> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + -
>>
>> 1 Shredder 9 UCI : 152.0/250 60.8 2462 2538 37 35
>> 2 Junior 9 : 23.0/ 50 46.0 2539 2511 75 96
>> 3 Hiarcs 9 : 21.0/ 50 42.0 2539 2483 66 91
>> 4 Fritz 8 : 19.5/ 50 39.0 2539 2461 75 88
>> 5 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 18.5/ 50 37.0 2539 2446 76 85
>> 6 Gandalf 6.0 : 16.0/ 50 32.0 2539 2408 101 80
>>
>>No engine seems to be able to stop Shredder 9 UCI.
>>
>>Kurt
>
>
>Do you mind testing a strong TheKing 3.33 setting here against S9 UCI instead of
>the older TO5? I'm sure that the T05 will provide better statistical results,
>but will you be using it much longer?
>
>Jason
Hi Jason
After having tested CM10k default at 40'/40 time control
to be seen at http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm, we have
in priniciple (for the reasons posted here earlier) no
intention whatsowever to further test The King 3.33 with
special settings. BTW: Do CM10k-settings exist which are
stronger than the best CM9k-settngs and which have been
thoroughly tested at reasonable time controls over a
sufficient number of games (400-600)? I know nothing
about such a setting -:) as I have so far seen the usual
blitz games only.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.