Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder 9 Test (40'/40) After 250 games / 5 matches

Author: Jason Kent

Date: 07:24:19 02/19/05

Go up one level in this thread


On February 19, 2005 at 08:14:04, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On February 19, 2005 at 08:00:17, Jason Kent wrote:
>
>>On February 19, 2005 at 04:52:20, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>Test: Shredder 9 UCI by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
>>>Time control: 40 min/40 moves
>>>Hardware: Ath 1.3/64 MB hash
>>>ponder=off, 3-4 men EGTB, Fritz8-GUI
>>>book=5moves.ctg, normal, no learning
>>>Details and games download at:
>>>[http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm]
>>>
>>>
>>>    Program                            Score     %    Av.Op.  Elo    +   -
>>>
>>>  1 Shredder 9 UCI                 : 152.0/250  60.8   2462   2538   37  35
>>>  2 Junior 9                       :  23.0/ 50  46.0   2539   2511   75  96
>>>  3 Hiarcs 9                       :  21.0/ 50  42.0   2539   2483   66  91
>>>  4 Fritz 8                        :  19.5/ 50  39.0   2539   2461   75  88
>>>  5 Chess Tiger 15.0               :  18.5/ 50  37.0   2539   2446   76  85
>>>  6 Gandalf 6.0                    :  16.0/ 50  32.0   2539   2408  101  80
>>>
>>>No engine seems to be able to stop Shredder 9 UCI.
>>>
>>>Kurt
>>
>>
>>Do you mind testing a strong TheKing 3.33 setting here against S9 UCI instead of
>>the older TO5?    I'm sure that the T05 will provide better statistical results,
>>but will you be using it much longer?
>>
>>Jason
>
>
>      Hi Jason
>      After having tested CM10k default at 40'/40 time control
>      to be seen at http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm, we have
>      in priniciple (for the reasons posted here earlier) no
>      intention whatsowever to further test The King 3.33 with
>      special settings. BTW: Do CM10k-settings exist which are
>      stronger than the best CM9k-settngs and which have been
>      thoroughly tested at reasonable time controls over a
>      sufficient number of games (400-600)? I know nothing
>      about such a setting -:) as I have so far seen the usual
>      blitz games only.
>      Kurt

I was aware that you didn't want to create 3.33 settings, but what if someone
else creates a good one?  I know Graham has been testing some 3.33 settings at
long time controls, and I have been also testing long time controls recently.  I
don't think we have 400-600 games yet, but if we show you the games, would you
test it?

Jason



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.