Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 07:40:20 02/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2005 at 10:24:19, Jason Kent wrote:
>On February 19, 2005 at 08:14:04, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On February 19, 2005 at 08:00:17, Jason Kent wrote:
>>
>>>On February 19, 2005 at 04:52:20, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>Test: Shredder 9 UCI by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
>>>>Time control: 40 min/40 moves
>>>>Hardware: Ath 1.3/64 MB hash
>>>>ponder=off, 3-4 men EGTB, Fritz8-GUI
>>>>book=5moves.ctg, normal, no learning
>>>>Details and games download at:
>>>>[http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + -
>>>>
>>>> 1 Shredder 9 UCI : 152.0/250 60.8 2462 2538 37 35
>>>> 2 Junior 9 : 23.0/ 50 46.0 2539 2511 75 96
>>>> 3 Hiarcs 9 : 21.0/ 50 42.0 2539 2483 66 91
>>>> 4 Fritz 8 : 19.5/ 50 39.0 2539 2461 75 88
>>>> 5 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 18.5/ 50 37.0 2539 2446 76 85
>>>> 6 Gandalf 6.0 : 16.0/ 50 32.0 2539 2408 101 80
>>>>
>>>>No engine seems to be able to stop Shredder 9 UCI.
>>>>
>>>>Kurt
>>>
>>>
>>>Do you mind testing a strong TheKing 3.33 setting here against S9 UCI instead of
>>>the older TO5? I'm sure that the T05 will provide better statistical results,
>>>but will you be using it much longer?
>>>
>>>Jason
>>
>>
>> Hi Jason
>> After having tested CM10k default at 40'/40 time control
>> to be seen at http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm, we have
>> in priniciple (for the reasons posted here earlier) no
>> intention whatsowever to further test The King 3.33 with
>> special settings. BTW: Do CM10k-settings exist which are
>> stronger than the best CM9k-settngs and which have been
>> thoroughly tested at reasonable time controls over a
>> sufficient number of games (400-600)? I know nothing
>> about such a setting -:) as I have so far seen the usual
>> blitz games only.
>> Kurt
>
>I was aware that you didn't want to create 3.33 settings, but what if someone
>else creates a good one? I know Graham has been testing some 3.33 settings at
>long time controls, and I have been also testing long time controls recently. I
>don't think we have 400-600 games yet, but if we show you the games, would you
>test it?
>
>Jason
Hello Jason
If you have a good CM10k-setting and at least 300-400 games
(6-8 matches at 50 games vs different very strong other
engines - of course no CM-settings) I might be prepared
to go for a longer test. Only on the basis of some good
games I would never "waste" my time with The King 3.33 -:)
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.