Author: blass uri
Date: 10:35:15 01/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 1999 at 12:06:51, robert flint wrote: >in response to the statements of weak endgame play by hiarcs in checked games 63 >and 77 against genius and found that the engame was not played badly but simply >in was a lost endgame due to tactics in the middle game. for proof of this i >left rebel9 and fritz4 on all night to play it out and the conclusions were >similar. I think 60.h4 is a mistake in game 63. You can call it tactical mistake but it is an endgame. I know that Genius3 on pentium100 rejects 60.h4 after less than 4 minutes I did not see a way for black to win after a king move for example 60.Kg2 In game 77 Hiarcs7 had queen, knight and pawns against Queen and pawns. Do you call it a middle game? all in all you cant pull a rabbit from a hat with no rabbit. when >making these statements please dont just look at the position for 5mins a say >blunder but put hours or days into the game and they you make come to see that >is not all as it seems. i would be happy to post rebel9 and fritz4 thoughts. >remember left were left on for over 24hours on a pentiumII 450!!!!!!!! I am interested to see rebel9 and Fritz4 thoughts. can they see a win for black if white does not move the pawn h4? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.