Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:54:26 02/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2005 at 12:24:10, stuart taylor wrote: >Because Shredder 9 doesn't do half as good as its earlier predescessor Shredder >7.04. >Even still, testers didn't bother testing Shredder 7.04 in recent tests, because >some demon seems to have told them that Shredder 7.04 HAS to be much weaker than >Shredder 9. > >I'm dissapointed at this downgrade in Shredder 9. >(or is there a mistake?) >S.Taylor I think that your conclusion are too early. Maybe the problem is that auto232 cannot be trusted as Bob Hyatt said in the past. I do not know the reason that Junior9 lost the same opening again and again as showed in this thread. A program that can lose sometimes the same opening again and again cannot be trusted and big difference in the results can be influenced by luck. In one match it is unlucky to lose the first game in opening that it cannot learn from it and the opponent learn and repeat the same opening and in another game it is lucky to win the first games or to lose them in opening that it can learn from them and the opponent get only 50% against it. Maybe the problem is not bug in the program but simply the autoplayer that cannot be trusted. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.