Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 10:31:28 02/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2005 at 13:13:01, George Sobala wrote:
[...]
>So this result is due to bad opening performance in particular circumstances by
>Junior 9, and does not in any way reflect on Shredder 9 v Shredder 7.04 relative
>strengths.
I fully agree. Such games should be deleted and not count or
even better: the book learning function should be disabled if
we want to know something about playing strength instead of
to good implementation of book learning. If one of these games
should have occurred at WCCC, it is for sure that Amir Ban
would at once change the book line and the game would never
be played again. This example shows for me the nonsense of
book learning and repeating the same book line again and again.
Such computer matches can leave a complete wrong impression -:)
Kurt
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.