Author: Jorge
Date: 15:52:14 02/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2005 at 08:32:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 17, 2005 at 17:28:36, Christian Koch wrote: > >>On February 17, 2005 at 17:23:03, Torstein Hall wrote: >> >>>On February 17, 2005 at 16:32:59, Christian Koch wrote: >>> >>>>On February 17, 2005 at 13:06:17, pablinhoz wrote: >>>> >>>>>very interesting match. 500 games, this is how every testing should be done. >>>>>Regards >>>>> >>>>> Pablo >>>> >>>>and remeber the very great timecontrol :-) >>>> >>>>Game in 3 minutes. GREAT STUFF for the trash >>> >>>Your post may be even better stuff for the trash! 3 minutes games are a common >>>time control, and of interest. And besides, the trend from Blitz games very >>>often holds true for all the longer time controls as well. >>> >>>Torstein >> >>Please be serious and ask the programmers what they think about this BIG time >>control. > >As a programmer I can say that results in every time control are interesting. > >Uri Uri, I know that this is a late post, but it caught my interest. I think you have a good background in Statistics to say the least(im pretty rusty right now with statistics), but ill bet there is a strong linear (or non-linear) relationship between comparing programs with short time control and their strength vs longer time cotrols and strength against one another. just a thought, jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.