Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Looks like a major flop in Shredder 9.

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 18:30:44 02/22/05

Go up one level in this thread


On February 22, 2005 at 12:34:51, Michael Yee wrote:

>On February 22, 2005 at 12:24:10, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>Because Shredder 9 doesn't do half as good as its earlier predescessor Shredder
>>7.04.
>>Even still, testers didn't bother testing Shredder 7.04 in recent tests, because
>>some demon seems to have told them that Shredder 7.04 HAS to be much weaker than
>>Shredder 9.
>>
>>I'm dissapointed at this downgrade in Shredder 9.
>>(or is there a mistake?)
>>S.Taylor
>
>I replied to one of your earlier posts on this topic:
>
>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?412946
>
>I can't tell if you're just kidding around or not (since you seem very convinced
>that Shredder has plateaued or declined since 7.04). But there really is
>randomness in these matches.
>
>Michael

I have no interest in "kidding around". But I sometimes must make a point which
will be noticed, and at the right time.
(and thanks for the repost too).
S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.