Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:18:04 02/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2005 at 08:09:12, Helmut Conrady wrote: > >>I thought that it is the fault of the interface and not the fault of the book. >>(I believe that Amir did nothing about learning and trusted the chessbase >>interface to do the learning for Junior) >>If this is the fault of the book then the interface that Junior9 is tested is >>irrelevant. > > >No! Because SDDF is testing the whole package. When a programmer uses a >"foreign" GUI to run his engine, then GUI problems are his own problems. Has a >user another chance to use Junior 9? No. You may criticize SSDF for their >testing conditions, but that´s completely another issue. > > >Helmut I only tried to explain the different results. I did not say that it is right for the ssdf to use the old interface. If Junior9 that played against shredder7.04 is weaker than Junior9 that played against Shredder9 because of a different interface it can explain different results. I understood from sandro that the interface was irrelevant for the mistakes of Junior and the problem is Junior's book. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.