Author: stuart taylor
Date: 09:33:38 02/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2005 at 12:01:22, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 23, 2005 at 10:53:03, stuart taylor wrote: > >>It's nice to see that all the 5.5 points going to Fritz 5.32 are draws. This >>suggests that Junior 9 is superior to Fritz 5.32 in ANY given situation. So that >>means there is nothing I should want to get Fritz 5.32 for for, if I canm get >>Junior 9. >>OK, so that's an easy one! >>But if Fritz 5.32 had even ONE (or certainly if it were 2 or 3)of those 5.5 >>points as a victory, then I would still be wondering if Junior was lacking >>something. >>S.Taylor > >Fritz5.32 not only won one game but also used significantly inferior >hardware(p200 against A1200) REALLY? I was just consoling myself that there is atleast SOMETHING which shows how far we've travelled in computer chess, up to a point that some of those old freak geniuses are now completely overtaken. And now you tell me a thing like this! What a pity! (OK so if it was just ONE win, I could bear that. But not such a difference in hardware) S.Taylor > >Note also that the fact that an engine won a game does not prove that it has >more knowledge in something. > >I expect Fritz5.32(p200) to score wins also against Fritz5.32(A1200) > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.