Author: Michael Yee
Date: 10:38:37 02/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2005 at 13:11:35, Andrew Wagner wrote: >1.) Efficiency - I do think this is important. Obviously, doing something in 15 >lines of (high level) code as opposed to 80 is superior. However, I don't think >it's the only thing. Clearly, Dann's obfuscated code wasn't terribly >inefficient, but nobody would ever use it. Do you mean compactness of the code (e.g., LOC) or the actual speed (running time) of the compiled program? One doesn't necessarily imply the other...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.