Author: Andrew Wagner
Date: 13:02:44 02/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2005 at 13:38:37, Michael Yee wrote: >On February 23, 2005 at 13:11:35, Andrew Wagner wrote: > >>1.) Efficiency - I do think this is important. Obviously, doing something in 15 >>lines of (high level) code as opposed to 80 is superior. However, I don't think >>it's the only thing. Clearly, Dann's obfuscated code wasn't terribly >>inefficient, but nobody would ever use it. > >Do you mean compactness of the code (e.g., LOC) or the actual speed (running >time) of the compiled program? One doesn't necessarily imply the other... I mean compactness of code without removing whitespace expressly for the purpose of compacting the code. If that makes any sense...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.