Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Commercial entrants to future CCT's

Author: Peter Skinner

Date: 19:42:12 02/24/05

Go up one level in this thread


On February 24, 2005 at 17:30:12, Ed Schröder wrote:

>You can't possibly know if the King and Junior weren't asked and what they have
>might have answered, also I don't what MIA (Ruffian) stands for. It doesn't
>matter much, the intend of Skinner is clear, an indecent swipe at the
>commercials. As former commercial I do take offense because I know his
>conclusions are far from the truth.
>
>Ed

Obviously it is not a swipe at a _all_ commercials.

Just the ones that gave "the excuse".

Why state you are preparing for an event that you never registered for, and
since the event is limited at 16 participants, could never _have_ registered
for.

When the excuse was given, there were 16 participants entered in the IPCCC. They
were never planning on going to the tournament, and could not have registered
for the event. It was full.

Therefore it was an _outright_ lie.

Are you now going to argue they simply forgot that it was full?

I remember asking a few private/commercial program author's if they would allow
an operator to run their program in the event when I was trying to fill an
uneven participant level. Those that replied simply passed on the offer, or said
there may not have been enough time to properly instruct an operator on how they
would like it run. _None_ seemed to be afflicted with the sudden onset of a
seizure due to Saturn and Mars being alligned.

Ed I can understand you trying to stand up for them, but you sometimes have to
admit when a spade is a spade.

Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.