Author: Rex
Date: 05:58:27 02/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2005 at 08:45:24, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On February 25, 2005 at 08:26:37, Rex wrote: > >>On February 25, 2005 at 08:08:38, gerold daniels wrote: >> >>>On February 25, 2005 at 07:22:03, Rick Hagen wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>14. IPCCC >>>> >>>>Rg. Name Pkte Wtg. >>>> >>>>1 M. Shredder 5 21 >>>>2 C. Hydra 5 20½ >>>>3 S. Gandalf 4 21 >>>>4 R. SOS 3½ 20 >>>>5 J. Johnny 3½ 20 >>>>6 B. Spike 3½ 17 >>>>7 F. Anaconda 3½ 16 >>>>8 M. Ikarus 3 20 >>>>9 R. The Baron 3 17 >>>>10 D. Diep 3 16 >>>>11 R. Nexus 2½ 22½ >>>>12 R. Patzer 2½ 16½ >>>>13 J. Neurologic 2 16 >>>>14 G. Isichess 1½ 16½ >>>>15 T. Quark 1½ 13½ >>>>16 S. Matador 1 14½ >>>> >>>>(where are my tranquilizers when I need them...) >>> >>>could shredder pull upset!!!!! >>> >>>gerold. >> >> >>If Shredder pulls upset win, I would call it a earned and deserved win. GREAT >>tourney so far. > > I see nothing special so far that can/could not > happen in every other short tournament -:) > Kurt Short or long makes no difference. A win is a win is a win regardless of length. As long as playing parties agree on rules and boundries then the winner deserves the win and is considered CHAMP. This notion of "more games need to be played" is for the birds, when a tourney is played.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.