Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 06:07:28 02/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2005 at 08:58:27, Rex wrote:
>On February 25, 2005 at 08:45:24, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On February 25, 2005 at 08:26:37, Rex wrote:
>>
>>>On February 25, 2005 at 08:08:38, gerold daniels wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 25, 2005 at 07:22:03, Rick Hagen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>14. IPCCC
>>>>>
>>>>>Rg. Name Pkte Wtg.
>>>>>
>>>>>1 M. Shredder 5 21
>>>>>2 C. Hydra 5 20½
>>>>>3 S. Gandalf 4 21
>>>>>4 R. SOS 3½ 20
>>>>>5 J. Johnny 3½ 20
>>>>>6 B. Spike 3½ 17
>>>>>7 F. Anaconda 3½ 16
>>>>>8 M. Ikarus 3 20
>>>>>9 R. The Baron 3 17
>>>>>10 D. Diep 3 16
>>>>>11 R. Nexus 2½ 22½
>>>>>12 R. Patzer 2½ 16½
>>>>>13 J. Neurologic 2 16
>>>>>14 G. Isichess 1½ 16½
>>>>>15 T. Quark 1½ 13½
>>>>>16 S. Matador 1 14½
>>>>>
>>>>>(where are my tranquilizers when I need them...)
>>>>
>>>>could shredder pull upset!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>gerold.
>>>
>>>
>>>If Shredder pulls upset win, I would call it a earned and deserved win. GREAT
>>>tourney so far.
>>
>> I see nothing special so far that can/could not
>> happen in every other short tournament -:)
>> Kurt
>
>
>Short or long makes no difference. A win is a win is a win regardless of
>length. As long as playing parties agree on rules and boundries then the winner
>deserves the win and is considered CHAMP. This notion of "more games need to be
>played" is for the birds, when a tourney is played.
Of course are you right here but I still see
nothing special -:)
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.