Author: gerold daniels
Date: 06:07:35 02/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2005 at 08:58:27, Rex wrote: >On February 25, 2005 at 08:45:24, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On February 25, 2005 at 08:26:37, Rex wrote: >> >>>On February 25, 2005 at 08:08:38, gerold daniels wrote: >>> >>>>On February 25, 2005 at 07:22:03, Rick Hagen wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>14. IPCCC >>>>> >>>>>Rg. Name Pkte Wtg. >>>>> >>>>>1 M. Shredder 5 21 >>>>>2 C. Hydra 5 20½ >>>>>3 S. Gandalf 4 21 >>>>>4 R. SOS 3½ 20 >>>>>5 J. Johnny 3½ 20 >>>>>6 B. Spike 3½ 17 >>>>>7 F. Anaconda 3½ 16 >>>>>8 M. Ikarus 3 20 >>>>>9 R. The Baron 3 17 >>>>>10 D. Diep 3 16 >>>>>11 R. Nexus 2½ 22½ >>>>>12 R. Patzer 2½ 16½ >>>>>13 J. Neurologic 2 16 >>>>>14 G. Isichess 1½ 16½ >>>>>15 T. Quark 1½ 13½ >>>>>16 S. Matador 1 14½ >>>>> >>>>>(where are my tranquilizers when I need them...) >>>> >>>>could shredder pull upset!!!!! >>>> >>>>gerold. >>> >>> >>>If Shredder pulls upset win, I would call it a earned and deserved win. GREAT >>>tourney so far. >> >> I see nothing special so far that can/could not >> happen in every other short tournament -:) >> Kurt > > >Short or long makes no difference. A win is a win is a win regardless of >length. As long as playing parties agree on rules and boundries then the winner >deserves the win and is considered CHAMP. This notion of "more games need to be >played" is for the birds, when a tourney is played. good morning rex. the key word in your statememt from above is (considered) champ. gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.