Author: gerold daniels
Date: 06:13:48 02/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2005 at 09:07:28, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On February 25, 2005 at 08:58:27, Rex wrote: > >>On February 25, 2005 at 08:45:24, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On February 25, 2005 at 08:26:37, Rex wrote: >>> >>>>On February 25, 2005 at 08:08:38, gerold daniels wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 25, 2005 at 07:22:03, Rick Hagen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>14. IPCCC >>>>>> >>>>>>Rg. Name Pkte Wtg. >>>>>> >>>>>>1 M. Shredder 5 21 >>>>>>2 C. Hydra 5 20½ >>>>>>3 S. Gandalf 4 21 >>>>>>4 R. SOS 3½ 20 >>>>>>5 J. Johnny 3½ 20 >>>>>>6 B. Spike 3½ 17 >>>>>>7 F. Anaconda 3½ 16 >>>>>>8 M. Ikarus 3 20 >>>>>>9 R. The Baron 3 17 >>>>>>10 D. Diep 3 16 >>>>>>11 R. Nexus 2½ 22½ >>>>>>12 R. Patzer 2½ 16½ >>>>>>13 J. Neurologic 2 16 >>>>>>14 G. Isichess 1½ 16½ >>>>>>15 T. Quark 1½ 13½ >>>>>>16 S. Matador 1 14½ >>>>>> >>>>>>(where are my tranquilizers when I need them...) >>>>> >>>>>could shredder pull upset!!!!! >>>>> >>>>>gerold. >>>> >>>> >>>>If Shredder pulls upset win, I would call it a earned and deserved win. GREAT >>>>tourney so far. >>> >>> I see nothing special so far that can/could not >>> happen in every other short tournament -:) >>> Kurt >> >> >>Short or long makes no difference. A win is a win is a win regardless of >>length. As long as playing parties agree on rules and boundries then the winner >>deserves the win and is considered CHAMP. This notion of "more games need to be >>played" is for the birds, when a tourney is played. > > Of course are you right here but I still see > nothing special -:) > Kurt to know the real champ in computer chess there would have to be at least 200 head to head games of the top engines. gerold :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.