Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 08:41:02 02/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2005 at 10:30:58, William Penn wrote: [snip] >Thanks to all for your suggestions. It looks like "C" is most often suggested as >a higher-level language, with later translation into Assembly for subroutines >that need to be as fast as possible. That's analogous to what I used to do with >Basic and Assembly on my old C64. >WP How did you do it? I recall back in the C64 days the built in Basic had no mechanism to include assembly routines. So I'd generate the assembly with MASM and put it in a string. Basic had a function to get the address of the string and a Call function (vs the standard Gosub) which you could use to call the assembly routine. Ahh, the good old days. Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.