Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 07:16:54 02/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2005 at 06:45:35, stuart taylor wrote: >On February 27, 2005 at 05:40:00, Mark Young wrote: > >>On February 27, 2005 at 05:33:53, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>Sorry, I hope now I write correctly: >>> >>>Shredder played on a clear slower hardware than Hydra! Hydra played on a very >>>fast hardware (32 processors!). Other many programs played on a slower hardware >>>as Shredder. >>> >>>Which program is the best, that can give us also only a test with an identical >>>hardware for all! >>> >>>Have eyerybody an other opinion? >> >>It is clear that Shredder is best. Meaning....I don't know what program is >>better on equal hardware Hydra or Shredder, but I do know everyone can own a >>copy of Shredder. >> >>And clearly Shredder 9 is the best bang for the buck. > >I'd rather ask what happens if you give Shredder a bit longer time for each >move. Even an hour, for an important move, we would see if Shredder is really >really great or not. >If it is true that Shredder 9 increases strength greatly, per ply, then Shredder >might really be great. And THAT, over the counter? if so, we have everything, >because we can always leave it on for an hour to see what move it comes up with. >S.Taylor I'm not sure that Shredder gets better with more time. Shredder lost its correspondance game against CC-GM Arno Nickel as the only out of 6 PC-Programs: http://www.chessfriend.com regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.