Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 07:20:34 02/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2005 at 10:16:54, Joachim Rang wrote: >On February 27, 2005 at 06:45:35, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On February 27, 2005 at 05:40:00, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On February 27, 2005 at 05:33:53, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>> >>>>Sorry, I hope now I write correctly: >>>> >>>>Shredder played on a clear slower hardware than Hydra! Hydra played on a very >>>>fast hardware (32 processors!). Other many programs played on a slower hardware >>>>as Shredder. >>>> >>>>Which program is the best, that can give us also only a test with an identical >>>>hardware for all! >>>> >>>>Have eyerybody an other opinion? >>> >>>It is clear that Shredder is best. Meaning....I don't know what program is >>>better on equal hardware Hydra or Shredder, but I do know everyone can own a >>>copy of Shredder. >>> >>>And clearly Shredder 9 is the best bang for the buck. >> >>I'd rather ask what happens if you give Shredder a bit longer time for each >>move. Even an hour, for an important move, we would see if Shredder is really >>really great or not. >>If it is true that Shredder 9 increases strength greatly, per ply, then Shredder >>might really be great. And THAT, over the counter? if so, we have everything, >>because we can always leave it on for an hour to see what move it comes up with. >>S.Taylor > >I'm not sure that Shredder gets better with more time. >Shredder lost its correspondance game against CC-GM Arno Nickel as the only out >of 6 PC-Programs: > >http://www.chessfriend.com > >regards Joachim I forgot to add how to find the game. Go to "GM Nickel - Engines" go to "Games with Live annotation" and look for the game "3. Nickel-Jupiter". The game is not finished there but in the meantime the game is in move 53 and Shredder is lost. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.