Author: Mike Hood
Date: 07:59:24 02/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2005 at 06:45:16, Rick Hagen wrote: >On February 26, 2005 at 23:20:09, Mike Hood wrote: > >>It's futile arguing about which 6-piece tablebases are the most useful. We will >>all have different opinions. As I see it, until we all have much more data >>storage on our home PCs we'll have to make compromises based on more practical >>considerations. My question is: has anybody put together statistics of the size >>of all the curently available tablebases, preferably in Megabytes? >> >>(I'd load the directory info into a spreadsheet program and calculate it myself, >>but not all the 6-piece tablebases are online at the moment). > >Mike, > >Can't answer your Q. regarding total size of currently available TB's, but: >The only 6-men TB I've installed is KRppKR, which consumes 4.35 GB >Don't have much room for other 6-piece tablebases, yet. > >Rick Thanks anyway, Rick. If nobody has the information for me, I'll start a table myself, just including the files online at the moment, adding the rest when Bob puts them back online. At the moment I have 33 GB of 6-piece EGTB's on my harddrive, mostly KxxP-KQ (plus a few games that occurred in my own club matches), and I still have 100 GB free.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.