Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:56:42 02/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2005 at 10:40:30, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 28, 2005 at 05:41:23, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On February 28, 2005 at 04:11:01, Tony Hedlund wrote: >> >>After being roundly beaten by Shredder 7.04, in every test, Junior 9 has now >>shown it's worth, and has slapped today's Shredder roundly in the face, >>repeatedly! >>S.Taylor > >I _could_ still lose the match by a slight margin, but no where near what >happened with Shredder 7.04. > >I still think 7.04 is the strongest version of Shredder out. We will have to see >how Shredder 9 does. > >Peter Shredder9 is leading 15-11 against Shredder7.04 in another match. You cannot decide which version of shredder is the stronger based on one match. The main problem is that games are not independent events. Note that for me more interesting data is rating of the engine based on random opening positions from GM games and no learning. At least in that case the expected error will be smaller. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.