Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 15:33:08 02/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2005 at 16:01:14, Frank Schneider wrote: >On February 27, 2005 at 04:58:40, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On February 27, 2005 at 04:15:30, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>> >>>[Event "IPCCC 2005"] >>>[Site "Paderborn"] >>>[Date "2005.02.27"] >>>[Round "9"] >>>[White "Hydra"] >>>[Black "Anaconda 2.0"] >>>[Result "*"] >>>[ECO "C99"] >>>[PlyCount "42"] >>>[TimeControl "6600"] >>> >>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 >>>O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 Qc7 12. Nbd2 cxd4 13. cxd4 Bb7 14. d5 Rac8 15. >>>Bd3 Nd7 16. Nf1 f5 17. Ng3 fxe4 18. Bxe4 Nc4 19. Bf5 Kh8 20. Be6 Qd8 21. Ne4 >>>Rc7 * >>> >>>Position is = (egual). >> >>Unfortunately After 22. Nfg5 Bg5 23. Bg5 Nf6 24. b3 Nb6 25. Qd3 Qe7 26. Bh4 Qd8 >>27. Rad1 Re7 28. Nf6 gf6 29. f4 Hydra has a strategic won game...no hopes for >>Anaconda. > >Yes... > >We were a bit unlucky in this game, because of a problem with our book. >We had intended to play Russian (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6) and disabled 2. ... Nc6 >in our book. However, although there were > 4000 games with 2. ... Nf6 in our >book, the GUI started the engine, which calculated 2. ... Nc6. All the next >moves were in book again and we got exactly the kind of position we didn't >want... > >Best, >Frank > > > > > >> >>Sandro I see. Well, there are lines/moves in this line that seems good enough, but most of them are not good to get a draw. It is a difficult line for computers as the chances to loose the right way are quite high. As soon as I saw you picked one of the loosing ones I understood you were going to loose. I think that in general you should be satisfied with the tournament result. Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.