Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 17:15:16 02/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2005 at 17:37:36, Charles Roberson wrote: > > I suppose he could have been over-reacting to your choice of > division names. Commercial could have been called Non-amateur. There was more at stake here. Over the day I have found out much more of what went on, and this was _definately_ a money issue for them. If it was a concern, it should have been brought forward and it would have been dealt with. That didn't happen. Sad really... There wasn't a single staff member that I have talked to that realized the potential for spectators and for ICC. All they saw was the $$$ not being placed in their hands. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.