Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 14:08:53 03/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2005 at 04:40:19, Harald Faber wrote: >> >> 3 Junior 9.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz, 2796 >>Shredd9 A1200 11.5-10.5 Shredd8 A1200 15-25 Shr7.04 A1200 12.5-27.5 > > >You can say what you want but it does not look "normal" to me that Junior 9 >scores best vs. Shredder 9 while it does much worse vs. the predecessors. Why do you think they play several matches before they publish rating? If J9 and S9 play another match the outcome can go the oposite way. One match is one match, you need several of them to be quite sure how strong a program is. (At least from a statistical point of view.) Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.