Author: KarinsDad
Date: 16:00:10 01/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 1999 at 17:04:41, Howard Exner wrote: >Moths are to light as Grand Masters are to ______ ? > >Yes you've summarized it nicely. Having such an event occur >of GM's vs computers (like Aegon or Harvard Cup but ensuring >the 40/2 time control) will need sponsorship. Chess seems to have >found a home on the internet. Events are being covered in real time >and articles abound on these events (today's Hoogovens for example). >If the internet is good for chess then maybe chess can be good for >the internet could be an approach to take with possible sponsors >who have a vested interest in the internet. Sponsors Microsoft, >Intel, AMD, Yahoo ... Would these big corporations be interested if they >could get something in return? I do not like the Internet solution for the GMs. What is to prevent a highly motivated GM from running the program at the same time in order to determine in each position the program's main PV and plan accordingly? Hard to control. The GMs should all be in one location where the games can be watched. Running the programs from the Internet is less of a problem. What are you going to cheat with, another program? Faster hardware? KarinsDad > >One other consideration that might deter GM's is there ability >to act as promotional vehicles for the software companies. While they would >be attracted to a monetary incentive they might not want to be used in >promotions for different software. Perhaps a contract stating that >they cannot be used in advertisements of the kind that say "buy X as >it defeated GM Y in the GM vs Computer Challenge Cup". > >It would be fun to watch a real 40/2 tournament like the one you are proposing. >Not random quick time control games on ICC, nor IM's playing in loud, >distracting shopping malls (Hergott vs Hiarcs for example).
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.