Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 16:29:09 01/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 1999 at 13:35:24, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On January 29, 1999 at 12:50:46, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>I choosed a fixed depth and played a move out of book i.e. 1.h2-h4 and compared >>the times. But you are right the difference between P90 and P200MMX is about >>75 elo. The hash-tables has increased about 4 times I guess this could give 10 >>-20 points. So the cpu difference could be about 60 elo. > >I checked again the difference P200MMX/P90 and I have the following: > >Cm5K 2.87x >Rebel 9 3.07x >Genius 5 2.94x >Hiarcs 6 3.03x >Mchess 6 2.62x > >Average = 2.9 > First of all very much thank you for your interesting tournaments! As you know SSDF are going to upgrade in the near future and we have to take a decision in march or so. Do you have any figures on the speed increase for programs on the P2-400 vs P200MMX. Do you or others have any proposal for what to choose (best for money). We can´t afford xeons or Kryotech-AMDs or a fragile overclocked celeron. The P3-500 looks good but is rather expensive. What about the new AMD. I hope someone can publish some tests with the new AMD if it is better than Intel I think we could choose AMD. I hope we can have some facts in this case before a decision in early march. Bertil >Enrique > >>Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.